Seventeen months
ago, I signed the deed to 124 East 2nd Street in Salida, Colorado
(see 20 March 2013 post). Located in the town’s historic district, the property
I purchased includes a main building dating to sometime between 1888 and 1890,
and an accessory building of unknown age heretofore referred to as the back
building. Suffering the effects of time and neglect, the preservation and
transformation of these two buildings into enduring functional spaces promised to
require considerable effort and resources. In other words, the signing on 20
March 2013 marked the first of many turning points; it marked the onset of many
delays.
Initially, I
focused on the main building. While I waited for my contractor to replace a
long lost downspout and a leaking skylight and to jack up a sunken corner of
flooring—for starters—I removed river rock and other rubble from the shallow
crawl space, I cut back crumbling mortar and re-plastered the face of interior
low-fired clay-brick walls, I tore off plywood jambs and casings that had been
standing in for original woodwork that had been removed throughout the building, and I drew
up plans for the electrical work. When the philosophy I learned from my
mother—if it’s worth doing,
it’s worth doing well—collided with my contractor’s
“lick and stick” approach, he and I parted ways, but not before he pointed me in
the direction of an architect who is well versed in codes and compliance.
evidence of Thordis at work in the main building |
Soon after
connecting with my architect, I realized that it made more sense to restore and
enlarge the back building before finishing the main building. Challenged by all
the things that code did not permit,
my architect and I worked together in fits and starts through the winter. Come
late July 2014, just when we thought we were finally ready to submit our plans
for the back building to the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) for
approval, we lost a week toward determining whether we would need an official
assessment of an existing window, dictating whether it was replaceable or had
to be restored. On 24 July we received word that the window assessment would
not be required because the building itself is not a designated historic
structure. And four days later, our plans were, at long last, submitted. We
were then scheduled to defend our plans before the
plans for the Simonsen Project |
HPC four weeks out, but
the date was ultimately postponed another week. Finally, we appeared before
the Board on 28 August. Our plan was accepted with one minor contingency that we
quickly addressed. And I toasted the milestone with a glass of Malbec.
Are we home free?
Can we begin work yet on the back building? No, we need permits: general
building, electrical, and mechanical. Once our drawings are complete, processing
our applications could take as long as 4 weeks. And once the permits are issued,
there will be other delays—inclement weather, builders not available, building
materials out of stock, inspections postponed. In other words, the completion
date for the renovation and expansion of the back building is best not to estimate.
In other words still, what I learned restoring a roofless house in Greece stone
by stone by hand over many years will serve me throughout the current Salida
restoration project as well: Na paei
makria, siga-siga; To travel far, travel slowly.